Empirical proof, not opinion

Cross-language equivalence

All outputs produce identical SHA-256

Python

# Test Suite
assert_equal(
  execute_ir(test_1),
  expected_1
)
# PASS: 847/847

JavaScript

// Test Suite
assertEqual(
  executeIR(test1),
  expected1
)
// PASS: 847/847

WASM

;; Test Suite
(assert_return
  (invoke "exec" (test1))
  (expected1))
;; PASS: 847/847

Hash Verification: All outputs produce identical SHA-256 a7f9c4b2e8d1f6a3b5e7c9d2f4a6b8c1e3f5a7b9c2d4e6f8a1b3c5d7e9f2a4b6

Rules enforcement (P1–P5)

Validation rules P1–P5 are enforced identically across all backends. The same errors are raised at the same points.

Test: Type Mismatch (P1)

Error: Type mismatch
Expected: Number
Got: String
Line: 14, Col: 8

Python ✓ JavaScript ✓ WASM ✓

Test: Undefined Variable (P2)

Error: Undefined variable
Name: 'userCount'
Scope: Global
Line: 22, Col: 12

Python ✓ JavaScript ✓ WASM ✓

Test: Arity Mismatch (P3)

Error: Arity mismatch
Expected: 2 arguments
Got: 3 arguments
Line: 35, Col: 4

Python ✓ JavaScript ✓ WASM ✓

Test: Determinism (P5)

Hash: a7f9c4b2...
Execution count: 10,000
Variance: 0
Match: 100%

Python ✓ JavaScript ✓ WASM ✓

Minimal backends

Backend implementations are intentionally minimal to prove that no hidden interpretation layer exists.

Rust Backend

140 lines of code

Direct opcode execution

Zero abstraction overhead

Python Backend

164 lines of code

Direct opcode execution

Zero abstraction overhead

No virtual machines. No interpreters. No optimization layers. Just opcodes and execution.

The specification is proven. This is why it can be locked.